untitled

Captain k'alaa's Corner for December, 2005
Koo koo ka choo, Mrs. Robinson?

Does any sort of spirituality really belong in a discussion about science fiction? I have talked to many people about this subject, and for the most part, I hear the same thing. Spirituality (or religion) is great, even wonderful in its place, but its place just doesn't belong on a message board, in a scifi web ring, or even in a book or a television show.

Science fiction itself came out of a literary movement in the nineteenth century - books that could be serialized in newspapers and bring the circulations up. One of the first (perhaps the first!) science fiction novels to be serialized was Around the World In 80 Days. This story was a vastly popular worldwide hit. Every week, each chapter was wired overseas, and the newspaper reading public waited with baited breath for each installment. Jules Verne, its author, was known as the father of science fiction, and books such as Voyage to the Bottom Of The Sea were also serialized in their turn. Saying this, once the ball was rolling, the audiences who were the most loyal to this type of novel were also those who were the most sceptical about things they could not prove (such as the existence of a higher being, etc.). And, throughout the years, being a fan of science and/or science fiction often meant a small amount of disdain for subjects steeped in spirituality.

I have seen spiritual issues being dealt with in almost all scifi movies and television. I mean, what is the Force in Star Wars but a spiritual element, and didn't someone say...

"Don't try to frighten us with your sorceror's ways, Lord Vader. Your sad devotion to that ancient religion has not helped you conjure up the stolen data tapes or given you clairvoyance enough to find the rebels hidden fortress--"

and Vader's reply? Other than basically strangling this guy, he says:

"I find your lack of faith disturbing."

In Star Trek V, spirituality is discussed with this famous Kirk line: "What does God need with a starship?" But true spirituality really comes into play in episodes of TOS with The Ultimate Computer or Who Mourns for Adonis? The Next Generation (with characters such as Ardra and the ancient Vulcans who came to think Picard was someone to kneel to), Deep Space Nine (the Emissary, the Prophets), Voyager (the Omega particles that Seven Of Nine found so interesting), or Enterprise with the Triannons and their "Chosen Realm".

Of course, there are many more instances of spirituality referred to in modern science fiction, I'm sure a whole book could be written about it (and probably has). But here at the AMAFSR, our focus is basically fan-made, science fiction-based websites. Tell me, do you believe that any sort of spirituality, outwardly religious ideals or any discourse regarding any established religion has a place on our sites, on message boards, in fan fiction, or anywhere we enjoy science fiction? I would really like to read your views on this subject. If you would like to see your opinions on this subject in print, please email them to kinda@msn.com, with the subject: Spirituality In Science Fiction? Your views could be read in the next edition of the Admiral Mudd and Friends Site Ring Newsletter.


Report Content · · Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com



Captain k'alaa's Corner for October, 2005

Have you ever found yourself watching a science fiction show or movie and adapting its "universe" to your favorite science fiction "universe"? I found myself doing this the other day. I was watching Stargate SG-1. Not being very knowledgeable about the series, I found myself actually mentally placing these characters in a Star Trek setting, and talking to the television (or myself, lol). I actually said out loud "they couldn't do it without force fields and long-range scanners" (!). Of course, they may actually "use" these devices in their stories and call them something else, but my impression of Stargate is that it is set in modern, not future times, and the technology available, though cutting edge, is not as advanced as, say Deep Space Nine. Yet I found myself placing them in that sort of setting.

When I was a kid, I knew two guys at school who used to compare Superman and Spiderman. The first guy would always say that no other superhero could possibly beat Superman because he was stronger than any human and didn't need gadgets to get the job done. The second guy would always point out that Superman's best attribute was also something that made him vulnerable to attack. Though the atmosphere of Earth made him stronger, exposure even to the element Krypton made him weak, even almost helpless. Ever since I experienced hearing those conversations at lunch time at school, whenever I see Superman or Spiderman, I associate them closely in my mind.

Although I am a dyed-in-the-wool Trekkie, there are many science fiction stories I love. I find a common theme of humanity and exploration in practically every science fiction book, movie or television show I have ever experienced. Has anyone else felt the same way? I would be very interested in reading about your experience with this. Would you like your story to be in the next Admiral Mudd and Friends Site Ring Newsletter? If so, please email me or Admiral Mudd at kinda@msn.com, with the subject: Re: My Adaptive Universe(s), and where you read this article.


Report Content · · Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com



Captain k'alaa's Corner for September, 2005

I have been watching a lot of DS9 and Voyager lately, and I have come to the conclusion that I would never want to go without being able to watch these two shows.

When TNG and DS9 were new, my children were smaller and we did not watch much television during prime time, especially during the week. Even on weekends, we were often busy doing other things. I missed many episodes of these shows. I believe I have only seen about a third of
The Next Generation, and last year Admiral Mudd and I watched all the episodes of Deep Space Nine from beginning to end. Up to that point, I had never seen most of the first season, and almost none of the second and third seasons.

I also missed out on watching almost all of
Voyager. Due to reruns, I have seen quite a few episodes, but I know there are some I have never seen.

As for
Enterprise, I was put off early in the first season due to the "oooh, rub (oil on) me baby" decontamination scene. Later, every episode I tried to watch had some sort of glaringly obvious Trek continuity error. Lastly, I enjoyed what episodes I have seen of the last season. It seems just as Enterprise began to really live up to the name Star Trek, it was cancelled. Such a waste! With the new-found respect of the Enterprise's producers for Trek continuity, they may have been able to have three, or even four more successful seasons. Of course, this point is moot now.

I could write page after page of opinion on this subject, however I would be afraid of boring people, lol! I would be very interested in reading other people's opinions on this subject. If you would like your opinion read by other science fiction fans, why not email it to kinda@msn.com, with the title "My Opinion On Trek". It could be in the next edition of the Admiral Mudd and Friends Site Ring Newsletter.


Report Content · · Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com



Captain k'alaa's Corner for July, 2005

Do you as a science fiction fan believe that the end of a television series or the end of making a series of movies means the end of a science fiction franchise?

I mean look at
Star Trek. The original series (aired from 1966 to 1969) really only came into its own in reruns, where it acquired one of the strongest fan bases for a television show in all of broadcast history. All through the 70's and 80's, the fan base expanded, until it culminated in the Trek movies, The Next Generation, Deep Space Nine, Voyager and Enterprise.

And what of
Doctor Who? This excellent show was on air for twenty-six years before its cancellation in 1989. The fans, through watching reruns, buying videos, audios, comics and books kept Who alive - and now, the excellent new series is nearing the end of its first season, and will be shown for another season soon.

Everyone, even non-fans know about the worldwide success of the first three
Star Wars movies, and all the products and books these movies put into demand. Result? George Lucas made the three very popular new movies, that have made new generations of Star Wars fans enthusiastic about this franchise again.

I believe fans exist because of excellence. Hard-working, creative people making their dreams come true, and in the process, entertaining millions of people.

Does anyone believe, either due to the end of
Enterprise, or the end of the Star Wars movies, or due to the ending of production for broadcast ANY science fiction show, that the show will die away? Or do you believe, as a fan - reruns, books and other products can keep your favorite science fiction going, due to the devotion of its fans and the excellence of what has already been created? We would love to read your opinion! Email us at kinda@msn.com, with the title "Will (your favorite Science Fiction show or movie) Live On?" You could see your opinions in the next edition of the Admiral Mudd and Friends Site Ring Newsletter.


Report Content · · Web Hosting · Blog · Guestbooks · Message Forums · Mailing Lists
Easiest Website Builder ever! · Build your own toolbar · Free Talking Character · Email Marketing
powered by a free webtools company bravenet.com